| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1997 Oxford University Press
Specialization Decisions Within Committee
University of Southern California
Stanford University
This study inspects specialization in legislatures by moving from a relatively macro level of analysis of committeefloor interaction to a relatively microlevel study of individual decision making within committe. This approach also addresses a common shortcoming in studies of specialization within committees: imperfect measurement. Signaling-theoretic reasoning provides a foundation for analysis of individual legislators' specialization decisions. Two testable conjectures are stated. One relates costs of specialization to the decision to specialize in an obvious fashion, and the other relates preference extremity to specialization in a manner that sharply contrasts a claim in recent literature on legislative participation. The empirical analysis centers on the House Energy and Commerce Committee and provides support for the conjectures, first in an indirect but conventional manner (probit estimates on cosponsorship) and then in a more direct and unique manner that addresses the obstacle of imperfect measurement of specialization.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Kim and L. S. Rothenberg Foundations of Legislative Organization and Committee Influence Journal of Theoretical Politics, July 1, 2008; 20(3): 339 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
