| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization V15 I1
© 1999 Oxford University Press
Article |
Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspectives
University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
Abstract
The public bureaucracy is a puzzle. How is it that an organizational form that is so widely used is also believed to be inefficient - both in relation to a hypothetical ideal and in comparison with private bureaucracies? This article examines public bureaucracy through the lens of transaction cost economics, according to which the public bureaucracy, like other alternative modes of governance, is well suited to some transactions and poorly suited to others. Rather than proceed in a completely general way, I focus on what James Q. Wilson describes as 'sovereign transactions', of which foreign affairs is an example. I ask what it is that distinguishes sovereign transactions, after which I compare the efficacy of public and private bureaucracies for managing such transactions. I conclude that there is an efficiency place for public bureaucracy, but that all modes of governance (markets, hybrids, firms, regulation), of which public bureaucracy is one, need to be kept in their place. I further observe that public bureaucracies are not all of a kind and that differences between them need to be distinguished.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S.-Y. Tang and C. W.-H. Lo The Political Economy of Service Organization Reform in China: An Institutional Choice Analysis J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., October 1, 2009; 19(4): 731 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Lee and G. Kingsley The Impact of Relational Factors on Contracting Management in Public Organizations Review of Public Personnel Administration, September 1, 2009; 29(3): 270 - 292. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Smith Institutional Determinants of Collaboration: An Empirical Study of County Open-Space Protection J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., January 1, 2009; 19(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Chia and R. Holt On Managerial Knowledge Management Learning, April 1, 2008; 39(2): 141 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Ulset The rise and fall of global network alliances Ind. Corp. Change, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 267 - 300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Sager Dialogical Values in Public Goods Provision Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2007; 26(4): 497 - 512. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Birner and H. Wittmer Better public sector governance through partnership with the private sector and civil society: the case of Guatemala's forest administration International Review of Administrative Sciences, December 1, 2006; 72(4): 459 - 472. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Sager The Logic of Critical Communicative Planning: Transaction Cost Alteration Planning Theory, November 1, 2006; 5(3): 223 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Walls, M. Macauley, and S. Anderson Private Markets, Contracts, and Government Provision: What Explains the Organization of Local Waste and Recycling Markets? Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2005; 40(5): 590 - 613. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. R. Alexander Capturing the Public Interest: Promoting Planning in Conservative Times Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2004; 24(1): 102 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J. Boddewyn Understanding and Advancing the Concept of `Nonmarket' Business Society, September 1, 2003; 42(3): 297 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. J. Dawkins Transaction Costs and the Land Use Planning Process Journal of Planning Literature, May 1, 2000; 14(4): 507 - 518. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|