Skip Navigation



Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization Advance Access published online on September 7, 2006
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, doi:10.1093/jleo/ewm020
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/3/731    most recent
ewm020v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swank, O. H.
Right arrow Articles by Visser, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Yale University. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Motivating Through Delegating Tasks or Giving Attention

Otto H. Swank 1 * and Bauke Visser 2

1 Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute
2 Erasmus University Rotterdam

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Otto H. Swank, E-mail: swank{at}few.eur.nl


  Abstract

An important role of managers is to motivate subordinates. Monetary rewards have been the focus of economic analysis. Managers also use other means to influence subordinates. If a manager can better assess the subordinate's ability than the subordinate himself, and if ability and effort are complements, the manager finds it hard not to overstate a junior's ability. Talk is cheap. We analyze under what conditions a manager can use organizational practices such as delegation and the selective provision of attention to credibly communicate his assessment. We compare their desirability. Delegation is preferable in case the manager's assessment is fairly accurate; attention is inescapable if it is inaccurate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.